Whether the probable cause for the issuance of an arrest warrant was insufficient to justify the petitioner's arrest?

QUESTION(S) PRESENTED PURSAANT 7° THE foc AVENDIENT? re PROBABLE CAUSE FOR THE DesaANeg : CF AN ARREST WARRANT FSTRELI SHE WHEY zpp fe Jurliner OTRIN EA appl : PRESEYTEA TO ThE MBEZOTROTE INSUFFICLENT 70 PROWE. ZETrrroNER COMET EA sy AALEZEDY CF FENISE 7 , 48 TE INOECTANNT IN THES CASE UVALEL Wity pr WBE NOT REEVES : LY 4 Shand tany P ZW A CRIM zZyAL WREAL; £2 77 REVERSZOLE on PRE Tate rag aposa " PRaownle For OVER THRMING EMT ane é COMEETZ OY WHEN THE Foray CMesz7Ttay” | PFRICA ANERICAIN § WERE cont O° ERE ST pra FA A Fhe Tete Omer zr ay | CMS FHE TRIAL coup re TOG PROTECT Mpe CVETITYTIONOZ ary OF ORT ag oY SONTEME Ine VETITIONER, To LORE PMAiisangy WHEY FA PROSEtaTi an PRESENTC Ey, 7 iy NTE CUCL rHng7 PETE TEONER, alec yp 7 “OMMZT FYE CODAE Fog HLCM HE 7. CNUECTE Gf P ToL comerrierrayaz Fen THE PRES FLING Tctgs ry 9g CRIMIMA COLE, WaTH THE Ws Tezr PTT ORMEY; Ani JE, WDQIZON ERG TREAL Ae BPEL LATE “ous, FO Be MEME © oe oF TAE SAKE SAR AlPSccez, Alig, ve CONLt] T OF. INTERES fT L7 Len EF 2. WAS conyre PETI7z ‘ ViCTEA zy 770 UIA FiLony WHRAER . Zo ring COMET Ty “BUI THE peg WE OF THE CON PRL Fy Zz ga) WHEN rg © snare FX Ss” S792 wy PRovzilees Lenker 7° rae CONTRARY P RALLY Ene OO OO) OO EEC —ee—_V—e ,