Monty Dwayne Sullivan v. Wyoming
SocialSecurity DueProcess FourthAmendment HabeasCorpus JusticiabilityDoctri
Was Sullivan deprived of his Constitutional rights?
QUESTION(S) PRESENTED 1. Was Sullivan deprived of his 5th, 6th and 14th Amendment Constitutional , Rights by all the lower Courts? These questions have been asked and not resolved by the lower Courts. ' 2. Was Sullivan deprived of his Right to Due Process in violation of 6th ~ Amendment by Prosecutor Jerry D. Williams of Hot Springs County, WY . : whom suppressed/withheld two medical exams, which proves Sullivan is ; actually innocent of the crimes of conviction by refusing the triers of fact, all , . relevant evidence and in accordance with Brady v. Maryland? 3. Was Sullivan deprived of his guaranteed Constitutional Right to Effective Assistance of Counsel when appointed counsel Valerie Schoneberger : _ presented herself as a Contract Attorney but in fact has a title of Wyoming : State Public Defender, Senior Assistance Appellate Attorney directly under ; supervision of Diane Lozano which Sullivan has a direct conflict with the whole Public Defenders Office due to the ineffective assistance of counsel at direct appeal? : ; 4. Was Sullivan’s United States Constitutional Right of Access to Courts ; hearings and procedures directly violated by Warden Michael Pacheco when , . Sullivan requested to attend the hearing at the Wyoming Supreme Court on a secure broadcast was DENIED? , 5. Was Sullivan’s United States Constitutional Right of Access to Courts hearings and procedures directly violated by Law Librarian R. Jones, when it took two months and eighteen days later for a viewing of a Children’s Advocacy Project (CAP) Video? ; i CONCISE STATEMENT OF CASE This case addresses violations of: 1) The U. S. Constitution [Amendments 5 & 6 & 14]; | 2) Standing Precedents: The Constitution of the United States of America; 3) Standing Court Rules [Mailbox Rule] and; , 4) Monty Sullivan’s Civil Rights. | Comes now, Sullivan requests that the judgment entered on July 16, 2019 by the Wyoming Supreme Court by Justice’s Davis, Fox, Boomgaarden and Gray in ‘Case No. S-18-0215 for the Appeal from the District Court of Hot Springs County, Wyoming by Judge Robert E. Skar be overturned and a new trail with an evidentiary hearing so Sullivan can finally fully develop the record to show his incarceration has been illegal from arraignment.