No. 19-6975
Jason Lee Bennett v. United States
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: 18-usc-2251 constitutional-rights criminal-law criminal-procedure due-process fifth-amendment sexually-explicit-conduct statutory-interpretation substantive-due-process
Key Terms:
Securities
Securities
Latest Conference:
2020-01-24
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether the District Court denied the Petitioner's constitutional right to a substantive due process under the Fifth Amendment by the lower court's construction of the term 'sexually explicit conduct' as set forth in 18 U.S.C. sec. 2251 (a)
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTION PRESENTED FOR REVIEW Whether the District Court denied the Petitioner’s constitutional right to a substantive due process under the Fifth Amendment by the lower court’s construction of the term “sexually explicit conduct” as set forth in 18 U.S.C. sec. 2251 (a). 5 ie
Docket Entries
2020-01-27
Petition DENIED.
2020-01-09
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 1/24/2020.
2019-12-27
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2019-12-06
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due January 16, 2020)
Attorneys
Jason Lee Bennett
James Steven Hershberger — Attorney at Law, Petitioner
United States
Noel J. Francisco — Solicitor General, Respondent