No. 19-6977

Samuel T. Pitts v. Florida

Lower Court: Florida
Docketed: 2019-12-17
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
Response WaivedIFP Experienced Counsel
Tags: adult-victims character-evidence constitutional-rights due-process equal-protection propensity-evidence sexual-battery sexual-offenses
Key Terms:
DueProcess
Latest Conference: 2020-02-21
Question Presented (AI Summary)

Whether constitutional equal protection and due process principles require that a defendant charged with a sexual offense on an adult alleged victim be afforded the opportunity to introduce evidence of 'good character' and reputation for non-violence with respect to sexual offenses in response to the prosecution being permitted to introduce collateral act evidence for the sole purpose of demonstrating the defendant's 'propensity' to commit sexual offenses

Question Presented (OCR Extract)

QUESTION PRESENTED FOR REVIEW Whether constitutional equal protection and due process principles require that a defendant charged with a sexual offense on an adult alleged victim be afforded the opportunity to introduce evidence of “good character” and reputation for non-violence with respect to sexual offenses in response to the prosecution being permitted to introduce collateral act evidence for the sole purpose of demonstrating the defendant’s “propensity” to commit sexual offenses. il B. PARTIES INVOLVED The parties involved are identified in the style of the case. iii

Docket Entries

2020-02-24
Petition DENIED.
2020-01-16
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 2/21/2020.
2020-01-08
Waiver of right of respondent Florida to respond filed.
2019-12-13
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due January 16, 2020)
2019-09-24
Application (19A330) granted by Justice Thomas extending the time to file until December 15, 2019.
2019-09-17
Application (19A330) to extend the time to file a petition for a writ of certiorari from October 16, 2019 to December 15, 2019, submitted to Justice Thomas.

Attorneys

Florida
Trisha Meggs PateOffice of the Attorney General Criminal Appeals Division Tallahassee, Respondent
Trisha Meggs PateOffice of the Attorney General Criminal Appeals Division Tallahassee, Respondent
Samuel T. Pitts
Michael Robert UffermanMichael Ufferman Law Firm, P.A., Petitioner
Michael Robert UffermanMichael Ufferman Law Firm, P.A., Petitioner