Whether mandatory vehicle liability insurance using criminal sanction violates NFIB v. Sebelius

QUESTIONS PRESENTED 1. Whether this courts holding against the individual mandate sanction in NFIB y. Sebelious 567 US 519, 132, S. Ct. 2566, 183, L Ed 2d 450 (2012) on the basis that it compelled commerce instead of regulating commerce equally applies to Kansas mandatory vehicle liability insurance using criminal sanction under State Tenth Amendment police and welfare powers. 2. Whether the Highest Criminal Courts of Last Resort in Two Different States Can Decide the Same Question of Presumption of Innocence Where One State’s High Court Violates This Courts Own Fourteenth Amendment Due Process Case Precedent in In Re Winship, is a Question of Critical Importance. 3. Whether Host States Who Impose Fines on Out of State Citizens for Unpaid Home State Vehicle Registration taxes for the Privilege of Egress and Regress through a Host State are in violation of the Dormant Commerce Clause, the Fourteenth Amendment Section One Citizenship Clause, the U.S. Constitutions Article IV Section One Full Faith and Credit clause, as well as Article IV Section Two Privileges or Immunities clauses.