Ernest Collins v. Barnes & Thornburg LLP, et al.
Whether the Eighth Amendment's prohibition on excessive fines applies to the states under the Fourteenth Amendment's Due Process Clause
No question identified. : tL. Dees Fie. ONS GLET) WAY FiueT ious ilies 1h 28 Us. ©. 8 2690 Coy APPLY Ww etect Mitte ee ClpwerT & xo ViOLarE aye PUT yl STITT yyy . Bits ” | 4+ DOES THE" CommiTé ps are, ALE £644 PiScteTioy “SeFTiou 5b. S.0.8§ 7Ol Ca)is_) APPLY Wltez, OE Ctl seg ay a . Mee Li ey ACT70Lj beso Vie Bes, He. PLAT; Fe UST TSF ecipy Briers 7 , | 375 T Fhe pee Toe a Osteo COVUeg7; © Bec, BE_Theg | vo CAE LIT ye OF 22 oy S.c., S2Eca 4) 24 4, CTU Te Disiss. Byow CT TS biog (4b) Ps Gey, fs WT! ostElid The. Peer ye OE Try TO . AHELI Ds THe. SOP rz, MEE L = Th a Wee RAT Fe lr Ve Derencn Vet | 4 WAY Dip THe STRAT Coys CRLes Rewer The PLAT] pel Wiscce ALU jus Teike, Case Rennes 7 tee -K Teme dle, (OT hy B&E_TtK re SHeporey, C cova $50. THE. Pelerrige | Case zz, oe LOK Cores a Lav SG MED ay Jones Sok Ens, Pe eetorey : 1983. \wizy WMS POR Pees rank! By THE ; ; VUES Size OMSTR jez Over, They VEE Ke. Dene SF uy Nes ISSvEp, Fece7 Spey, Pox, VaTIg Wreznere F8e_theez. bess ELTA, REPS nee AU TYs. BS Ricrieg, Su riie Letty Hee, te bes es Eee ‘ “TAs —4Se Was Sopp tes < Ase. OYE Ke AGo. > Was NFR En, oF, “7 KLege, Brean, Fecu VOD Aes Bessy Aca, of Sere py y Ca WHC WAS RESo Fee, of My BAY Ce] Comaz