Whether RLUIPA's 'appropriate relief' clause encompasses the requested relief of a trial on the merits

QUESTIONS PRESENTED . I.) WHETHER RLUIPA'S “APPROPRIATE RELIEF” CLAUSE ENCOMPASSES THE REQUESTED RELIEF OF A TRIAL ON THE MERITS AND IF SO, DID PLAINTIFF'S REQUEST OF A TRIAL ON THE MERITS IN HIS COMPLAINT ENTITLE HIM TO THE APPROPRIATE RELIEF OF A TRIAL ON THE MERITS CONCERNING RLUIPA, AND DID THE SIXTH CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS ERR IN FAILING TO CONSIDER PLAINTIFF'S APPROPRIATE RELIEF ARGUMENT IN HIS REPLY BRIEF? II.) WHETHER THE 1* CIRCUIT'S RULING IN SPRATT AND THE 6" CIRCUIT'S RULING IN SPIES CONFLICT EACHOTHER CONCERNING WHETHER INMATE-LED IS CONSTITUTIONAL AND/OR PERMISSIBLE UNDER RLUIPA, AND IF SO, IS THE SPRATT COURT CORRECT AND IF NOT, WHY IS THE SPIES COURT CORRECT? II.) WHETHER THE GENERAL APPELLATE RULE THAT PROHIBITS CLAIMS FROM BEING ADDRESSED BY APPELLATE COURTS ARE NOT RAISED ON APPEAL APPLY TO A DEFENDANT'S DEFENSES AND A PLAINTIFF'S ISSUES, AND IF SO DID THE DEFENDANTS FAILURE TO TAKE THEIR TWO OPPORTUNITIES TO RAISE THEIR QUALIFIED IMMUNITY ARGUMENTS TO THE 6" CIRCUIT OF THE APPEALS IN THE TWO APPEALS IN THIS CASE CAUSE THAT DEFENSE TO BE WAIVED ON REMAND? 1