No. 19-6993
IFP
Tags: constructive-denial-of-counsel due-process fourteenth-amendment habeas-corpus personal-jurisdiction sixth-amendment
Key Terms:
AdministrativeLaw DueProcess FirstAmendment HabeasCorpus JusticiabilityDoctri
AdministrativeLaw DueProcess FirstAmendment HabeasCorpus JusticiabilityDoctri
Latest Conference:
2020-01-10
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Did the trial court divest itself of personal jurisdiction of Lundy when it administered the law in an improper and unconstitutional manner?
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTIONS PRESENTED QUESTION 1 Did the trial court divest itseld of personal jurisdiction of Lundy when it Administered the Law in an improper and unconstitutional manner? QUESTION IT Was Lundy's conviction in violation of Due Process of Law under the Sixth and Fourteenth Amendment due to the Constructive Denial of counsel, thus entitling him to relief? | 2 .
Docket Entries
2020-01-13
Petition DENIED.
2019-12-19
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 1/10/2020.
2019-12-12
Petition for writ of habeas corpus and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed.