No. 19-6994
Christopher William Manikowski v. Mark S. Inch, Secretary, Florida Department of Corrections
Tags: 28-usc-2253 appellate-procedure certificate-of-appealability constitutional-right constitutional-rights debatable due-process federal-procedure habeas-corpus judicial-review standard-of-review statutory-interpretation
Key Terms:
FifthAmendment DueProcess HabeasCorpus CriminalProcedure
FifthAmendment DueProcess HabeasCorpus CriminalProcedure
Latest Conference:
2020-01-17
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether the court of appeals improperly denied the Petitioner a certificate of appealability under 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTION PRESENTED FOR REVIEW Whether the court of appeals improperly denied the Petitioner a certificate of appealability under 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c) on the basis that the Petitioner failed to make a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right that jurists of reason would find “debatable.” il B. PARTIES INVOLVED The parties involved are identified in the style of the case. iii
Docket Entries
2020-01-21
Petition DENIED.
2019-12-30
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 1/17/2020.
2019-12-20
Waiver of right of respondent Mark S. Inch, Secretary, Florida Department of Corrections to respond filed.
2019-12-16
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due January 17, 2020)
2019-09-20
Application (19A320) granted by Justice Thomas extending the time to file until December 16, 2019.
2019-09-17
Application (19A320) to extend the time to file a petition for a writ of certiorari from October 17, 2019 to December 16, 2019, submitted to Justice Thomas.
Attorneys
Christopher William Manikowski
Michael Robert Ufferman — Michael Ufferman Law Firm, P.A., Petitioner
Michael Robert Ufferman — Michael Ufferman Law Firm, P.A., Petitioner
Mark S. Inch, Secretary, Florida Department of Corrections