No. 19-7000

David Constance v. Darrel Vannoy, Warden

Lower Court: Fifth Circuit
Docketed: 2019-12-18
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: crawford-v-washington fair-trial fourteenth-amendment hearsay-testimony impartial-trial ineffective-assistance ineffective-assistance-of-counsel insufficient-evidence sixth-amendment
Key Terms:
DueProcess JusticiabilityDoctri
Latest Conference: 2020-02-21
Question Presented (AI Summary)

Whether Mr. Constance was denied a fair and impartial trial due to the State Courts' denial of hearsay testimony

Question Presented (OCR Extract)

QUESTIONS PRESENTED 1. Reasonable jurists would determine that Mr. Constance was denied a fair and impartial trial with the State Courts denial concerning hearsay testimony; 2. Reasonable jurists would conclude that the State obtained Mr. Constance's conviction with insufficient evidence; 3. Reasonable jurists would conclude that Mr. Constance was denied effective assistance of counsel during trial and Appeal. INTERESTED PARTIES District Attorney's Office 21* Judicial District Court BO. Box 639 Amite, LA 70422-0639 Darrel Vannoy, Warden Louisiana State Penitentiary General Delivery Angola, LA 70712

Docket Entries

2020-02-24
Petition DENIED.
2020-01-23
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 2/21/2020.
2020-01-17
Waiver of right of respondent Darrel Vannoy to respond filed.
2019-12-05
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due January 17, 2020)

Attorneys

Darrel Vannoy
Elizabeth Baker MurrillOffice of the Attorney General, Respondent
Elizabeth Baker MurrillOffice of the Attorney General, Respondent
Darrel Vannoy, Warden
Zachary T. Daniels21st Judicial District Office of the District Attorney, Respondent
Zachary T. Daniels21st Judicial District Office of the District Attorney, Respondent
David Constance
David Constance — Petitioner
David Constance — Petitioner
David Constance — Petitioner