No. 19-7001
Haji Bagcho, aka Haji Bagh Chagul, aka Haji Bagchagul v. United States
IFP
Tags: acquittal criminal-procedure due-process fifth-amendment jury-selection jury-selection-and-service-act racial-bias racial-discrimination sixth-amendment
Key Terms:
FifthAmendment
FifthAmendment
Latest Conference:
2020-04-17
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether a criminal defendant can be denied time to inspect jury records where the jury office's policy prohibited earlier observation of the venire or venire list?
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTIONS PRESENTED I. Whether pursuant to the Jury Selection and Service Act | a criminal defendant who observes a racially skewed | venire can be denied time to inspect jury records where the jury office’s policy prohibited any earlier opportunity to observe the venire or venire list? II. Whether the Fifth and Sixth Amendments to the United States Constitution prohibit imposing punishment based on crimes for which a jury acquitted the defendant and | for uncharged conduct? | | | i
Docket Entries
2020-04-20
Petition DENIED.
2020-04-02
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 4/17/2020.
2020-03-19
Memorandum of respondent United States filed.
2020-02-10
Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is further extended to and including March 19, 2020.
2020-02-07
Motion to extend the time to file a response from February 18, 2020 to March 19, 2020, submitted to The Clerk.
2020-01-13
Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is extended to and including February 18, 2020.
2020-01-10
Motion to extend the time to file a response from January 17, 2020 to February 18, 2020, submitted to The Clerk.
2019-12-17
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due January 17, 2020)
Attorneys
Haji Bagcho
Sandra Gayle Roland — Federal Public Defender's Off., Petitioner
Sandra Gayle Roland — Federal Public Defender's Off., Petitioner
United States
Noel J. Francisco — Solicitor General, Respondent
Noel J. Francisco — Solicitor General, Respondent