Omar Folk v. Prime Care Medical, et al.
SocialSecurity HabeasCorpus
Whether Third Circuit Court of Appeal Judges applied the correct standard under Rule 60(c) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure
QUESTION(S) PRESENTED 1.) Whether Third Circuit Court of Ap eal Judge's apply the Standard Under Timely 60(C)( is from the Doc. 115 Jan. 26, 2018 District Court Opinion. See(Doc. T1279 T-4 and 18-21. 2). Whether Third Circuit Court of Appeal. Judge's Abuse of Discretion For Not Staying Mandate on Doc. 82 Filed 1/27/17 page 5. Dec. 200 is pending in District Court on this issue under "McCoy v. Louisiana, No. 168255". Grim. No. 1:11-CR-292 and Doc. 129 at 15 and 17. 3). Whether Third Circuit of Appeal Judge's Erred by Not Addressing Doc. 130 District Court Opinion Nov. 19, 2018 page 1-2 and Doc. 129 page 15 “Discovery”. 4). Whether Third Circuit Court of Appeal Judge's Erred by Not Addressing Doc. 134 Under Fine and Cost on No. 181352 and 18-3602 Double Jeopardy Theory. See(Rutledge v. US) 5). Whether Question Before Supreme Court Under Banister v. : Davis,(No. 18-6943), granted Cert. June 24, 2019, Whether A Rule 59(e) Motion In A § 2255 proceeding is subject to the Second or Successive Rules of the Gonzalez v. Crosby, : Now Petitioner Question at 1-2. See(Folk v. Prime Care Medical; 771 Fed. Appx. 141; 2019 U.S. App. Lexis 18293 No. 18-3602 June 18, 2019) and Petition For Rehearing Denied on 7/30/19. ; a ; mal . fon) = ; ™~ wo N ™ a? ct 4 . 11/01/2019 . .