No. 19-7013
Kenneth M. Gray v. Paul S. Kemper, Warden
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: civil-rights confession criminal-procedure due-process false-confession false-promises ineffective-assistance interrogation no-merit-report parent-attorney post-conviction-counsel sentencing sentencing-error waiver waiver-petition
Latest Conference:
2020-02-21
Question Presented (from Petition)
Whether post-conviction counsel failed to file a "no-merit" report.
Whether detectives made false promises to illicit a confession during the interrogation of the petitioner without his parent or attorney present.
Whether the District Attorney falsified a petition of waiver and improperly waived the petitioner into adult criminal court.
Whether Judge Franke's sentence was based on inaccurate information and was harsh.
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether the petitioner's constitutional rights were violated due to ineffective assistance of post-conviction counsel, false promises by detectives during interrogation, improper waiver into adult court, and harsh sentencing based on inaccurate information
Docket Entries
2020-02-24
Petition DENIED.
2020-01-30
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 2/21/2020.
2020-01-23
Waiver of right of respondent Paul S. Kemper to respond filed.
2019-10-23
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due January 21, 2020)
Attorneys
Kenneth M. Gray
Kenneth M. Gray — Petitioner
Paul S. Kemper
Scott Edwin Rosenow — Wisconsin Department of Justice, Respondent