No. 19-7016
Matthew Terrell v. C. Armant, Warden, et al.
IFP
Tags: 14th-amendment assault certificate-of-appealability criminal-appeal due-process jackson-v-virginia oral-copulation substantial-evidence
Key Terms:
HabeasCorpus
HabeasCorpus
Latest Conference:
2020-02-21
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Should a certificate of appealability be granted to review whether there was a violation of Jackson v. Virginia, 443 U.S. 307, 317 and the Due Process Clause of the 14th Amendment?
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTION PRESENTED Should a certificate of appealability be granted to review whether there was a violation of Jackson v. Virginia, 443 U.S. 307, 317 and the Due Process Clause of the 14" Amendment? There was not substantial evidence that petitioner could be convicted of assault with intent to commit rape or oral copulation.
Docket Entries
2020-02-24
Petition DENIED.
2020-02-06
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 2/21/2020.
2019-12-16
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due January 21, 2020)