Whether the Miami-Dade State Attorney's Office is breaching the Commerce Clause by deducting wrongly calculated child support from Guevara's paychecks to send interstate

QUESTION(S) PRESENTED 1. Under the COMMERCE Clause — Article 1,, Section 8, Clause: Isn’t MiamiDade State Attorney’s Office and their State Players breaching this Commerce Clause because they insist on deducting, amounts that have been proven wrongly calculated child support from Guevara’s paychecks to send “interstate,” from Miami to New York? 2. Doesn’t GUEVARA have a Constitutional Right to be with her son, Joshua Padin who has been hidden from her for almost 11 years and with whom she has been blocked from having phone calls with for about 9 months; as part of her punishment of not allowing the lower and foreign courts to siphon her relatives funds of which she was only POA? 3. As authorized by 28 U.S.C. § 1331 — 1446; which includes § 1407 multiple civil cases involving one or more common questions of fact ete shouldn’t GUEVARA’s case be heard in Federal Court as stated by this law that if GUEVARA has not and cannot receive justice in the lower court , then this and other laws provide that if a party cannot receive justice in a state | court, then the case and all these issues are then to be brought and heard in District Court, under the crux of the claim and issues that arose in this District, per U.S. Code: Title 28, Sections 13301369? However, now to be heard in the US Supreme Court? 4. Since Bell v Hood holds that the “Federal courts may use any available remedy to make good the wrong done, when there is sufficient harm from the law or action challenged , then when does a Petitioner receive justice since GUEVARA is considered a “nobody” like “Gideon” (Gideon v. Wainwright (1963) but since the action GUEVARA is challenging is of Great Public Significance and Importance? 2 .