Whether the panel erred in construing Darwich's motion as a motion for reconsideration under local rule 7.1(h)(1) and remanding the case back to the district court

QUESTION(S) PRESENTED AETER THE PANEL DETERMINE THE DISTRICT COURT’ ERRED BY CONSTRUING DARWICH'S MOTION AS A MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION FILED UNDER LOCAL RULE 7.1(h)(1)ARE THE PANEL SHALL REMANDED THE CASE BACK TO THE DISTRICT COURT ? IF THE DISTRICT COURT NEVER DENIED OR GRANT RULE 60(B)(6) DED THE PANEL ERRED TO REVIEW FOR AN ABUSE.\OF DISCRECTION? OR THE PANELS , ORDER OF SEPTEMBER 20, 2019 UNDER LACK OF JURISDICTION TO DO SO ?. ARE THE PANEL OF THE SIXTH CIRCUIT COURT ERRED OF HOLDING THE DISTICT COURT ERRED BY CONSTUING . RULE 60(6)(6) UNDER MOTION OF RECONSIDERATION , FILED UNDER LOCAL RULE 7.1(h)(1) ? AFTER THE PANELS DITERMING DARWICH MOTION 60(b)(6) THE PANELS UNDER LACK OF JURISDICTION TO RULE ON THE MOTION RULE 60(b)(6) BECAUSE THE DISTRICT COURT FIRST SAHLL RULE ON DARWICH MOTION ? , Petitioner Question the Court of Appeals after _ determine Darwich Case under rule 60 (b)(6)shall remanded the case back to the district court to _ make ruling " Dened or Grant " after the District ; ; Gourt make ruling the Appeals court under power of “Jurisdiction . Petitioner Claim the Sixth Circuit of appeal panel under lack of jurisdiction to rule. ; . on darwich case of rule 60(b)(6).