Whether police custodial interrogation on less than probable cause for arrest held violative of 18 U.S.C. §§ 241-242 and Petitioner's 4th Amendment rights directly linked to improper police conduct and evidence obtained as a result to be held as insufficiently attenuated as to purge the evidence to substantiate Petitioner's convictions

QUESTION(S) PRESENTED Tesve “L7 Ulhether police custodial saterregetson ok less than probable cavse bor avvest held violative ot 18 3.6, 9§ Al-z4z aud Petitrouens IH Aeend scent /igler> Ge. directly hiked 4p vapsvoperpolice conducts aud eidéeuce. Obtaiued as a vesult +o be lield as susutticventtly attenuated a5 to pert OBE ot tie evdlence Jo substautiarte Popttuers Convictions . TeveV ' (hhesier Jane cumulative (SA AyvendteusyDue Hoeess Niglde yioladouws ClMinated je JE USC, 83 dee by all Sete Agevds aud Aedes mpolved uw tevivienen% Case Wa /8 Us.c, S565. IBULC, $1512 and He. Gsse and Mrepodice Roles CONT brtiug 40 leti~rouer~ enter (ig a negotiated Plea ovkuousig ly aud wniutelligecrtly € Lave*%s: thhetier the Us, Asc toicd Guv-ts -fovecies rg He olbiee of 2BUSCE 225 by desigu with meouplete auch Mot€ cial documents ad recovds Violative o€ [803.0% /S0&, Gud rertbrenew's [HH AMead Meet VIGh4t55 to cexceal Gud Pperpetvate the “1sdeeds of Stare Agents ard Actors Actiug vuder Cola cf lau BUS. C. ZFC, Tasve%#: Uhether Hee I" Creo Coord of Appeals’ dental of Counsel was Violative of fhe Restidtwcet "> 6 Amend yond wight ts (usel ye eguitably aad Hbeetively . address tha questious g vanted +o be heavd by rhe HE Great, aswellas tie Gustitu-troval aud boceduval Nie Poces Villationr8 Merths plse/ved by Sedge Marrfin usitun fertreuer& case ®