No. 19-7044
Darmarcus Fisher v. United States
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: aggravated-assault appeal appellate-review criminal-procedure criminal-sentencing district-court due-process fifth-circuit procedural-reasonableness sentencing sentencing-enhancement sentencing-guidelines standard-of-review substantive-reasonableness
Key Terms:
DueProcess
DueProcess
Latest Conference:
2020-01-24
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether the district court imposed a substantively unreasonable sentence and erred by imposing a 4-level enhancement for aggravated assault
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTION PRESENTED FOR REVIEW Whether the district court imposed a substantively unreasonable sentence and erred by imposing a 4-level enhancement for aggravated assault. 1
Docket Entries
2020-01-27
Petition DENIED.
2020-01-09
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 1/24/2020.
2020-01-03
Waiver of right of respondent United States of America to respond filed.
2019-12-18
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due January 21, 2020)
Attorneys
Darmarcus Fisher
Gregory S. Park — Federal Public Defender's Office, Petitioner
Gregory S. Park — Federal Public Defender's Office, Petitioner
United States of America
Noel J. Francisco — Solicitor General, Respondent
Noel J. Francisco — Solicitor General, Respondent