No. 19-7049
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: appellate-review civil-procedure civil-rights constitutional-claim criminal-law criminal-procedure due-process federal-jurisdiction habeas-corpus ineffective-assistance personal-liberty pro-se-petition punishment standing strickland-standard undue-delay
Key Terms:
DueProcess
DueProcess
Latest Conference:
2020-01-24
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether petitioner is being deprived of his civil rights due to undue delay in appellate ruling
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
No question identified. : ; : IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS ; . FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT ANTWOYN TERRELL SPENCER df )eE ‘eo Gs Appellant, Pro Se, at, Be") UY OE v. ) Case No. _19-2883 : Warden J. Fikes ) Sy WE: IR nme # Appellee. — ) OLOLrarl Ey: : APPELLANT'S BRIEF , a Antwoyn T. Spencer , #14781-041 Unit K-1 FILED “Federal Correctional Institution ~ DEC 0 eS Ce : p.o. Box 1000 6 2019 . OFFICE ; Sandstone MN 55072 SUPREME COURT ESS (1)
Docket Entries
2020-01-27
Petition DENIED.
2020-01-09
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 1/24/2020.
2020-01-07
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2019-12-06
Petition for a writ of mandamus and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due January 22, 2020)
Attorneys
Antwoyn Spencer
Antwoyn Spencer — Petitioner
United States
Noel J. Francisco — Solicitor General, Respondent