Whether the 35 U.S.C. 101 patent eligibility restrictions unconstitutionally violate the First and Fourteenth Amendment rights of the petitioner

QUESTIONS) PRESENTED =Eote Rew ot He Loewe v-Oshfa! Rea Bese f o B Docs SII51D restrict sudo phil pelitioner’s couvee Veview ao the kasis ot his belieF oF his 6r violating his Cosstitational ronts ¢ , “Does er en eT Baw, ay crak vicldte the Tirt Amendment of the OS. Copsttutiods Preeciom of Celttion ABD Fourteenth AmeDAMedtKs Lue Precess duck Fal Protection Clauses othe level oF wreldatia/o UMDING B oriminal, Codvicrlov, When the Oreste “WSS 1 Lhe midst oF SITS = | \ihio@tron SOGINSt the arresting Nd Orosecutting, county (S Dees the pubic Sek News SACIAG) Conbainiwa Hre AG pees HED with Rise eaect cso pticas ey his gbrs~ Owsl WS achvikes mee tothe level dofsmatiod Wd viols— ono the Firstaadk Loorteanth Amendments of thy U-S. CovShuto F ives KH Due recess protecoo ¢ , , RECEIVED ~ , DEC 19 209