No. 19-7059
John Kenneth Schiefer v. United States
Tags: appellate-review criminal-law criminal-procedure district-court due-process judicial-discretion legal-reasoning plain-error procedural-error respect-for-law sentencing sentencing-guidelines sentencing-procedure
Key Terms:
SocialSecurity Securities Immigration
SocialSecurity Securities Immigration
Latest Conference:
2020-01-24
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Did the district court plainly procedurally err when it selected and imposed sentence based on its desire to promote the defendant's respect for the law?
Question Presented (from Petition)
Question Presented Did the district court plainly procedurally err when it selected and imposed sentence based on its desire to promote the defendant’s respect for the law? i Statement of
Docket Entries
2020-01-27
Petition DENIED.
2020-01-09
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 1/24/2020.
2020-01-06
Waiver of right of respondent United States of America to respond filed.
2019-12-18
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due January 27, 2020)
Attorneys
John Kenneth Schiefer
Brianna Fuller Mircheff — Office of the Federal Public Defender, Petitioner
Brianna Fuller Mircheff — Office of the Federal Public Defender, Petitioner
United States of America
Noel J. Francisco — Solicitor General, Respondent
Noel J. Francisco — Solicitor General, Respondent