Kent Glen Williams v. Brooks, et al.
Securities
Was prisoners constitutional and statutory right to petition and religious freedoms violated when the district court dismissed his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 civil rights suit against jail guards for refusing to comply with the court's order to undergo a Department of Corrections directed 'health screening' unrelated to the claims in the underlying suit?
QUESTION(S) PRESENTED Was prisoners constitutional and statutory right fe Petition and felugtous Freedoms Violated whew the Disttich couct dismyssed his 4a vse $1993 (aus suit against Jo) guards for Fong *o comply With the courts order 7 undergo a Department of Corrections directed “Health screening, unfelated to the claims in the under ling suit e RA tioner asks this court to decide if Ais Fight to petition onder GA@ Lest and Loucteewth Amevdment was violated whes the district court ordered petitioner 4 Consert to an open ended, unspecified Departmevt of corrections “health screenings thew dismissed fhe suit Whew petitioner did not agree fo comply with the order. A “Health screening flat was fequested by the defendant of fhe Jaw suit and vinceleved fo the claims jn the suit, And jor Ma the dismissal of fle Jaw suit Violate Perroners feholous Freedoms under the first Amwdmevt ond RLULPA.