No. 19-7066

Evaristo Toscano v. Joe A. Lizarraga, Warden

Lower Court: Ninth Circuit
Docketed: 2019-12-26
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
IFP
Tags: 6th-amendment confrontation-clause due-process effective-assistance-of-counsel evidence-tampering harmless-error judicial-bias prejudice-comments redacted-statement right-to-counsel right-to-present-defense sixth-amendment
Key Terms:
DueProcess
Latest Conference: 2020-02-21
Question Presented (AI Summary)

Whether a violation of petitioner's right granted by the Confrontation Clause of the United States Constitution was harmless beyond a reasonable doubt

Question Presented (OCR Extract)

QUESTIONS PRESENTED FOR REVIEW. 5 , 6 Whether a violation of petitioner's right granted by the Confrontation Clause of the United States Constitution was 7 ||harmless beyond a reasonable doubt; 8 : sas Whether loss evidence interfered with petitioner's United 9 || States Constitutional 6th amendment right to present a defense; ro Whether admission of petitioner's redacted statement 11 || violated both petitioner's rights granted by the Confrontation Clause and the Due Process Clause of the United States 12 Constitution; 13 Whether petitioner's United States Constitutional right to 14 * || due process and his right to a trial by jury were violated when 15 ||the trial judge made prejudice comments regarding petitioner's expert witness; 16 17 Whether petitioner was deprived of his United States : : Constitutional right to effective assistance of trial counsel. : 18 19 20 21 , ° 22 : i. 23 ‘ 24

Docket Entries

2020-02-24
Petition DENIED.
2020-02-06
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 2/21/2020.
2019-11-14
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due January 27, 2020)

Attorneys

Evaristo Toscano
Evaristo Toscano — Petitioner
Evaristo Toscano — Petitioner