Whether the lower court erred in applying Twombly to pro-se plaintiff's complaint when Erickson controlled

QUESTIONS PRESENTED (1) WHETHER THE LOWER COURT ERRED IN APPLYING THIS COURTS HOLDING IN BELL ATLANTIC CORP. V. TWOMBLY, 550 U.S. 544 (2007) TO PRO SE COMPLAINT WHEN THIS COURTS HOLDING IN ERICKSON V. PARDUS, 551 U.S. 89 (2007) CONTROLLED, (2) WHETHER THE LOWER COURT ERRED WHEN IT DENIED PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT THE OPPORTUNITY TO PROVIDE SUPPORTING EVIDENCE THAT HER MENTAL ILLNESS ENTITLED HER TO EQUITABLE TOLLING, IN CONFLICT WITH THIS COURTS HOLDING IN . HAINES V. KERNER, 404 U.S. 520 (1972), (3) WHETHER THE LOWER COURT'S RULING CONFLICTS WITH THE MAJORITY OF RULINGS BY FEDERAL CIRCUIT COURTS PERTAINING TO CLAIMS OF MENTAL ILLNESS, AND (4) WHETHER THE LOWER COURT ERRED IN : TRANSFERRING PETITIONER'S CASE TO A MAGISTRATE JUDGE WITHOUT HER CONSENT, CONTRARY TO 28 U.S.C. § 636(c)(1). . Lag