Did the Ninth Circuit commit error by failing to recall the mandate based upon this Court's intervening decision in Lamar, Archer & Cotrin. LLP v. Appling, 138 S.Ct.1752 (2018)

QUESTIONS PRESENTED 1. Did the Ninth Circuit commit error by failing to recall the mandate based upon this Court’s intervening decision in Lamar, Archer & Cotrin. LLP v. Appling, 138 S.Ct.1752 (2018)(“Lamar’)? 2. Did the Ninth Circuit shirk its’ responsibility to consider the new evidence in the form of the Machado declaration submitted on February 12, 2018, under the principle in Hazel-Atlas Glass Co. v Harttord-Empire Co., 322 U.S. 288 requiring appellate Courts to take action when confronted with Fraud upon the Court? 3. Does new evidence in the form of judicial admissions by the judge of . bias render the findings of the Bankruptcy Court void on its face due to judicial bias? 4. When an inspection of the judicial roll shows that the judgment is void on its face, does an appellate court have the jurisdiction to declare the judgment void on its face? . 5. Is the conversion order converting the Debtor’s case from Chapter 11 to Chapter 7 a void order based on a deprivation of due process under Powell v. Alabama, 287 U.S. 45 (1932)? . PARTIES All parties to this Petition appear in the caption of the case on the cover page. However, all of the