No. 19-7080
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: criminal-procedure due-process due-process,criminal-procedure,federal-law,supreme failure-to-render-aid federal-law florida-statute-316.193 judgment-of-acquittal motion-for-acquittal standard-of-proof statutory-interpretation supreme-court-precedent
Latest Conference:
2020-02-21
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Did the First District Courts of Appeals apply federal law issued by the United States Supreme Court in a way that frustrates and undermines its holdings set forth IN RE Winship, 397 U.S. 358 (1970) and United States v. Chandler, 388 F.3d 796, 805 (11th Cir 2004)
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTIONS PRESENTED I. Petitioner ask did the First District Courts of Appeals apply federal law issued by the United States Supreme Court in a way that frustrates and undermines its holdings set forth IN RE Winship, 397 U.S. 358 (1970) and United States v. Chandler, 388 F.3d 796, 805 (11% Cir 2004), wherein the trial court(s) denied defence Motion for Judgment of acquittal as to failing to render aid and give information set forth in Fla. Stats. 316.193 (3)(c)3b? | i
Docket Entries
2020-02-24
Petition DENIED.
2020-01-16
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 2/21/2020.
2020-01-08
Waiver of right of respondent Florida to respond filed.
2019-12-15
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due January 27, 2020)
Attorneys
Florida
Stanley Jaboin
Stanley Jaboin — Petitioner