Does this Court of Appeal's Opinion conflict with the Court of Appeal's decision in In re the Marriage of Tydlaska?

QUESTIONS PRESENTED 1. Does this Court of Appeal's Opinion, to affirm the Trial Court's decision to make or modify a child support order without a current Income and Expense Declaration from both parties, conflict with the Court of Appeal's decision in In re the Marriage of Tydlaska? 2. When issues on appeal are matters of law or interpretation of statutes which standard of review will be used? Will it be the Abuse of Discretion standard or the De Novo standard? 3. Is the appellant's right to due process violated when the appellant's request for a continuance during trial was denied by the court? An unexpected event occurred during the trial that rendered the court and all parties unprepared to make a child support order. The unexpected event was not the fault of the appellant.