No. 19-7086
Walter Daniel Prezioso v. United States
Tags: acquitted-conduct constitutional-rights criminal-procedure due-process fifth-amendment sentencing sixth-amendment
Key Terms:
DueProcess FifthAmendment
DueProcess FifthAmendment
Latest Conference:
2020-04-03
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether reliance on acquitted conduct in imposing sentence violates the Fifth and Sixth Amendments?
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
Question Presented Whether reliance on acquitted conduct in imposing sentence violates the Fifth and Sixth Amendments? i Statement of
Docket Entries
2020-04-06
Petition DENIED.
2020-03-19
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 4/3/2020.
2020-03-09
Reply of petitioner Walter Daniel Prezioso filed.
2020-03-02
Memorandum of respondent United States filed.
2020-01-23
Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is extended to and including March 2, 2020.
2020-01-22
Motion to extend the time to file a response from January 29, 2020 to March 2, 2020, submitted to The Clerk.
2019-12-20
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due January 29, 2020)
Attorneys
United States
Noel J. Francisco — Solicitor General, Respondent
Walter Daniel Prezioso
Brianna Fuller Mircheff — Office of the Federal Public Defender, Petitioner