No. 19-7088
Marcos Cortez-Rogel v. United States
Tags: burden-of-proof criminal-procedure defendant-rights indictment jury-trial prior-conviction sentencing statutory-maximum
Key Terms:
Immigration Privacy
Immigration Privacy
Latest Conference:
2020-04-03
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether all facts—including the fact of a prior conviction—that increase a defendant's statutory maximum must be pleaded in the indictment and either admitted by the defendant or proven to a jury beyond a reasonable doubt?
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTIONS PRESENTED L Whether all facts—including the fact of a prior conviction—that increase a defendant’s statutory maximum must be pleaded in the indictment and either admitted by the defendant or proven to a jury beyond a reasonable doubt? i
Docket Entries
2020-04-06
Petition DENIED.
2020-03-19
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 4/3/2020.
2020-03-11
Reply of petitioner Marcos Cortez-Rogel filed.
2020-02-28
Brief of respondent United States in opposition filed.
2020-01-22
Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is extended to and including February 28, 2020.
2020-01-21
Motion to extend the time to file a response from January 29, 2020 to February 28, 2020, submitted to The Clerk.
2019-12-23
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due January 29, 2020)
Attorneys
Marcos Cortez-Rogel
Christopher A. Curtis — Federal Public Defender's Office, Petitioner
Christopher A. Curtis — Federal Public Defender's Office, Petitioner
United States
Noel J. Francisco — Solicitor General, Respondent
Noel J. Francisco — Solicitor General, Respondent