Is pro-se petitioner entitled to court's liberal construction of his complaint?

QUESTION(S) PRESENTED TB PRO-SE PETITIONER ENTITLED TO THIS court’ Nect— DING OF ENTIRE AAATTER IN CONTROVERSY BY TSSCUNG A WRIT OF MAMAAMLIS CALISING N.C. GOVEAOR ROY A.COgP— ERUL TO DECLARE N.C. @.S14-71 GMCONSTLTUTIONAL ? TS PRO-SE. PETITIONGR ALSA BATITLED TO REPEAL AND NESSQLUTION OF A.C. 8.S./4-7.1P is Ppro-se& PETITIONER ENTITLED TO ANDITIONAL RELIEF TAL THES KIRIT OF HIS CUSTORLAK BRYAN K. AIELLS TO ZMAABATATELY RELEASE HEM IMZTH OUT GOMDETLIGNS? TS PRO-SE PETITLONER ENTITLED LIBERALL CONSTRLic— TION OF HLS CQAAPLAZAIT Q LS IT UNCAKIFUL FOR STATE GOVERMBAITS TO ASSEMBLE CRIMELMALSIATUSKS INTO GREAIINAL STATUTE 70 BA HANCE REPEAT OFFEAINGA SENTENCES? IS PRO-SE PETITIONER BNTITLED TA CaouRTS! LIBERAL CONSTRLIETLON OF HLS PATITLIONZAS APPLICATIOM FOR COURT TO NECIAE AAATTER BATERELY BY REMANDIAIG CASE TO DISTRICT COURT, INITH INSTRUCTIONS TO DECLARE ALC.G8, 14-7.) UMNCONSTITY traNAL ANK ORDER REDLIC TION GF HIS (2) CONSECUTIVE IG8 MONTHS AXIS 211 MONTHS SBNTENCE 74 02) CONSECUTIVE 20 MONTHS TO 25 AAOAITHS TIME SERVED AKIN ORDER HIS CLISTOAIAN BRYAN K. AIELLS TARELEASE HIAd IAD TH LIT COMDITIONSP