Whether petitioner is entitled to a remand with instructions for the district court to order the case dismissed with prejudice because the prosecution's only evidence was a latent fingerprint lift that the jury confused as a latent fingerprint of the petitioner

ESTIONs) PRESENTED ARE 92954 PETITLONER(S\ ENTITLLEA TO REAAAND, INILTH INSTRUCTIONS FOR AISTRICT COURT TQ ORDER CASE ATSMISSED AITTH PREAUDICERECAUSE OF PROSEC.UTIPS ONLY EVIAENCE WAS A LATEMT?FINGER. PRINT LIFT THAT JURY CONFUSED AS A LATEAIT FINGER PREAIT ROTH OF INHECH BELOMGED TA PETITIONER | Yo : TS A LATENT FINGER PRINT LIFT AND A LATENT FIAICER PRENT,.ONE IN THE Same? TS A LATENT FINGER PRINT, LIFTEN ofr SURFACE, EVINENCE OF A RAND ANN LARCENY!