No. 19-7097
IFP
Tags: confrontation-clause criminal-procedure cross-examination due-process out-of-court-statements prior-testimony testimonial-statements trial-evidence witness-memory witness-testimony
Key Terms:
SocialSecurity Securities Immigration
SocialSecurity Securities Immigration
Latest Conference:
2020-03-27
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether a defendant in a criminal case is denied the opportunity for full and effective cross-examination in violation of the Confrontation Clause
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTION PRESENTED Whether a defendant in a criminal case is denied the opportunity for full and effective cross-examination in violation of the Confrontation Clause by the admission of a prosecution witness’ prior out-of-court testimonial statements and identifications when the witness, although physically present at trial, has no memory of the prior identifications or statements. i STATEMENT OF
Docket Entries
2020-03-30
Petition DENIED.
2020-03-12
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 3/27/2020.
2020-02-27
Brief of respondent State of California in opposition filed.
2020-01-27
Motion to extend the time to file a response from January 29, 2020 to February 28, 2020, submitted to The Clerk.
2020-01-27
Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is extended to and including February 28, 2020.
2019-12-18
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due January 29, 2020)
2019-10-09
Application (19A400) granted by Justice Kagan extending the time to file until December 21, 2019.
2019-10-07
Application (19A400) to extend the time to file a petition for a writ of certiorari from October 22, 2019 to December 21, 2019, submitted to Justice Kagan.
Attorneys
Juan Sanchez
Nina Wilder — Office of the State Public Defender, Petitioner
Nina Wilder — Office of the State Public Defender, Petitioner
State of California
Kenneth N. Sokoler — California Department of Justice, Respondent
Kenneth N. Sokoler — California Department of Justice, Respondent