No. 19-7101

David Nowakowski v. E.E. Austin and Son, Inc., et al.

Lower Court: Pennsylvania
Docketed: 2019-12-30
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: civil-rights criminal-organizations criminal-procedure criminal-racketeering due-process inchoate-crimes legal-remedies legislative-interpretation organized-crime pro-se pro-se-litigation racketeering standing statutory-construction
Key Terms:
DueProcess
Latest Conference: 2020-02-28
Question Presented (AI Summary)

Where a plaintiff's position falls within the scope of an open Legislative statement, can the open ended nature of the statement be used to offset long established rules for the achievement of legal doctrine capable of addressing specific threats to person, family, business, community, state, and nation and in the process provide absolute and direct due process to 'pro se out of necessity' parties who need to address the courts directly, due to threat from racketeering, inchoate crimes, criminal organizations, and organized crime?

Question Presented (OCR Extract)

Questions Presented Where a plaintiff's position falls within the scope of an open Legislative statement such as PA Code Title 18 Section 911 (a) (6); “in | order to successfully resist and eliminate this situation, it is necessary to provide new remedies and procedures”. Can the open ended nature of the statement be used to offset long established rules for the achievement of legal doctrine capable of addressing specific threats to person, family, business, community, state, and nation and in the process provide absolute . and direct due process to “pro se out of necessity” parties who need to address the courts directly, due to threat from racketeering, inchoate crimes, criminal organizations, and organized crime. ; i

Docket Entries

2020-03-02
Petition DENIED.
2020-02-13
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 2/28/2020.
2020-01-29
Brief of respondent E.E. Austin and Son, Inc. in opposition filed.
2020-01-27
Waiver of right of respondent General Electric Co. to respond filed.
2019-12-20
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due January 29, 2020)

Attorneys

David Nowakowski
David Nowakowski — Petitioner
E.E. Austin and Son, Inc.
Sunshine R. FellowsThe Levicoff Law Firm, Respondent
General Electric Co.
Roger H. TaftMacDonald Illig Jones & Britton LLP, Respondent