No. 19-7117
Vance Edward Ingram, III v. United States
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: appeal-waiver appellate-procedure constitutional-law constitutional-rights criminal-procedure defendant-rights due-process government-power plea-agreement plea-bargaining waiver
Key Terms:
DueProcess HabeasCorpus
DueProcess HabeasCorpus
Latest Conference:
2020-01-24
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Is a defendant's right to due process of law violated when the government requires an appeal waiver as part of a plea agreement?
Question Presented (from Petition)
QUESTIONS PRESENTED 1. IS A DEFEDANT’S RIGHT TO DUE PROCESS OF LAW VIOLATED WHEN THE GOVERNMENT REQUIRES AN APPEAL WAIVER AS PART OF A PLEA AGREEMENT? ii
Docket Entries
2020-01-27
Petition DENIED.
2020-01-09
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 1/24/2020.
2020-01-07
Waiver of right of respondent United States of America to respond filed.
2019-12-17
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due January 30, 2020)
Attorneys
United States of America
Noel J. Francisco — Solicitor General, Respondent
Noel J. Francisco — Solicitor General, Respondent
Vance Edward Ingram
John David Bryson III — Wyatt Early Harris Wheeler LLP, Petitioner
John David Bryson III — Wyatt Early Harris Wheeler LLP, Petitioner