No. 19-7122

Vinodh Raghubir v. Mark S. Inch, Secretary, Florida Department of Corrections

Lower Court: Florida
Docketed: 2019-12-31
Status: Dismissed
Type: IFP
IFP
Tags: access-to-courts attorney-fees civil-procedure civil-rights constitutional-violations criminal-procedure due-process habeas-corpus ineffective-assistance post-conviction-relief standing takings
Latest Conference: 2020-02-28
Question Presented (AI Summary)

Whether the Petitioner's constitutional rights were violated when the lower court dismissed his petition for writ of habeas corpus

Question Presented (OCR Extract)

No question identified. : , i | Wore Priiivint Te SiRkeme Bork putde y/le) , WW) He So Yyeontitr Cory oe prpiar , Veerne ja Boker Faecal aupszion! ow A WAY pr Lorfesert wiry Relivalr Nessesnls of TA 1S Corlf~ I | i Buue \. Ys , BY lV lest ale De Srprvrrky KdER L of UPedaties", m4 Ppopaecy Fils peat Prd evint. [qo he Wlekes er Smite oH 08S 46 orPsah m Kory, L pinelt CeaRAes Pryor of Fwy Fee Wiehe sre Aw) | Cons D60K 4 PETiTIN fed whit oF Mann “<s pied jyl pis Case fA “Coa Teeae ChimidAL Peoeneding Lwin le PETITION Stes Arlen 06 Wit fdrer reer Gaintting phberiy Bx 2eTING phe Lar oF | Ied teeth, mol) | 2. Pain V. Fold HoTIR. ComPidly 84 SWAY , ) YHA Eig he |APeoPte Lala of INN ef Fb Yea | ic: od AdPAAL i ate [sr MA, wh) mE Fell | [ee Unnor pe Ah) <Sieas PRG) Hodinl | Pyerersit /s rCekkect —u4r 4 by gmiccat W)toyPep DICE. S$ TATA ponlLe A Wacmicene pitt Pestwhice whos tHe Usmecae bis Ne bree oF PkéerwdsNG A Phery From £64UNG HIS CLAIMS... I) YSaniccne Pha MPES DAY MAST oF . looses AS A Phi con rio FO Mh plans <M VS phe. Chew nee 1S TANTAM OUT 7 WY EMISCAL Witt Phi fpDI te /F te Pehidleire 15 Filanerarry wgre To PAY Whe Coors # Pres", Ah | | 2 thereo YUiréh Spares , Br] Subbyeutesryy LL bBUWMA eR 2 Ng PETITIONG) oR weir oF Manbwand’ ria ang ott Fela Gone , Freel) iW Die MT beh, | | . . b Jara | FolKAedenG" , _ Witeodr. Cpilstre daca a | lef Te US. sopleme Cou! Fidunlg nl<Cdmbe 7, tee hunle. ee ee a Noy Lari oF wlpeaed geuthierene(y dared oo. | “pe iS bolted aby nf Benepe. PRON OP Re Levy Te WMP MAW) 02 AatsJD od —-Nofienl , a _o. CS on wd Neale Vple Prereats 2 Lew AS phe Spe oo. bite. oY LM fe. . FF ~pcpaestte, Pp. teg.\iNGS. !AK aHat ABA | pos ap BFP a | A tive (Dt Cops A Clie Pros . 4, Quesrien | | Thien Op Cows d, Mitra Of Anbe;nes Z| Se dedaronl Prine ido eni~z Ak ud V ys ay on Vo Fo) Mune ComPaucy 1 Cheres Vvnirt) Satra& Sido VS 495; 242, | 124 €. £40 Fre ISD upd ah PPE Doos | ‘ herteemad Vo Pope | | Seumapr Qe te Oe, 6 | Atcumeyr, Conewsrons. | | op | Sok Saibsotved e Canleqiens Phocwled gaf wey : eng. Coursey! , itis, \ tel Awl CAPES ole. , — ~ = Mle ab. plptaonee. OY feldt 1 Ade Phe end inlgk Lon tile. wb uleakerend paler unlwalnd, # edlipltDa) Corpeter IG prt Badan ey? le iM pakuaiscpbey " gfeyod _... 44deegarng, FAA GING, ALTERS, ANEW ING , bahphlens, on Wy Eyl ahd... AiGlS 4 buek OF Pete) Ae , cn lie bf) ualey ABU. OE. MSRETION V6 ASGHT, MICS = ee wg. path», fhe aliter dS, Ai Bash PTA), Foie Agha oe sordid, La utetiod DF _f2AS, C2558, FiléS, ConlfrFeorfos — .. ple. outers oe oak pRocapdngi", Oa bridib So. it Dh. VEkbhee De Av OPA AG Cote fpe LP 1KuANte 0 —ple Fak duee Di h., Fe Cattle aT Cage AE Ne chal Lan LN phe INGA Ore. eke. Perle) 4% LatibAne. . a . Danek oF ve Peadyseenttig Lagr "Gandlrinne. ) Peco +r ple low ! Pn To “DCF ine. on wyoe oF GAL Pha CHA) mj OK nia lLoutrs bovis To “—Spenlee, Wire" Ole ParirioNee AS foro / j fg 0 seh i PEAT TIO bPutsemur 7 Fh. Soar. SF. OK Apia nla) 7 | Dr Coke y” SAT 677-061, Wihtett Dicmned ra A parities Fok whir op MAD VW" Sherine | Rarer oF CAtlrme 15 borsMaaed 8 I eolbrncor Cini PRoewedme V<ben 1h Sot) py pub Pirie Commi Aro Vv. Con awo Ob if Jo APlnak lok of Frolir4 Hod wile ' phe tear prorned) | Sed Poe CR PPA oF Tie B<Esd PTV Fea Dhe PRI WBE pdilapey Ltiks Pho 4S OA) {59 oS, IS whe pe phe ACN preeens Pte LilaDd op ‘ (DM Ay) pM WIL AeAviung SERVE. pr) Pia wor) Ni OR) er een) © Rorves) me. Lf Fenos , Thi PETINGILS Fteors— iVA SVB RAL Mopmd 1 Viepne "dior" z hl EE. , 4 WH VAR OYE { ' Fivdi | ey, ie ae pp pdilérte jnlokhecuy | @Q. whe Aw De rSa Te Monon) | Rein ; Me 9S, IN PE. Jer hed A 4c ¢ nie It dM l | qo low maa, Lok oF HE Folin earoer cnt (te PEsiTio APPRRE Pre4va7 7 fitz w#l) | lp op pe 40 2 Liha. of Phe. Petes) To Pho NE A \ io Pohaged, ONL Demon inApva NWr>/uivey Pesetah Be le Ae Cee TP teeth Po 8% Oh LL ibe Dod ewe peed e_lobhaeG” _ oo. fe AD RRMA. wae Diseense) , Pubes WoL. we be lod meaey, Co Pinees Ge me Oyee. le Heads wake Weber ne eee ee eae De. BF sues pre ae ee)

Docket Entries

2020-03-02
The motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis is denied, and the petition for a writ of certiorari is dismissed. See Rule 39.8.
2020-02-13
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 2/28/2020.
2019-12-18
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due January 30, 2020)

Attorneys

Vinodh Raghubir
Vinodh Raghubir — Petitioner
Vinodh Raghubir — Petitioner