What is the proper interpretation of CFR 7 226.6 (c) (v)

QUESTIONS PRESENTED FOR REVIEW : ; As required by Rule 14.1(a) Question #1 + Whatis the ‘proper’ interpretation of CFR 7 226.6 (c) (v). (copy enclosed) This question arises in direct relation to circumstances in the case. Enclosed are statements from second administrative hearing, showing the AU did not address the length of time being imposed by the USDA regional oo Office in Dallas, upon Mrs. Whitaker whom | was accused of allowing to | : participate in USDA program as a ‘disqualified individual’. This interpretation has me permanently excluded by Arkansas Dept. of Human Services (ADHS). This interpretation allows for Mrs. Whitaker to be on the National Disqualified . . List (NDL), for (12) twelve years, not (7) seven. From 1997 thru 2009. After over two years, The Western District Court in El Dorado, AR. Was able to . help obtain a declaration from USDA National Office in Virginia, from Ms. 3 Jennifer Weatherly, FOIA officer, and from colleages that are familiar with this case. (enclosed). Question #2 . Was ALI correct to refuse to hear if Mrs. Whitaker’s time on the list (NDL), was proper, as the institution that was placed on it at the same time that she was, | was off the list in (7) seven years, and she was not. (enclosed pg. 84,85; 260-262).