No. 19-7156
Robert E. Clayborne v. Brad Hansen, Warden
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: civil-procedure civil-rights constitutional-law due-process false-arrest habeas-corpus jurisdiction standing unlawful-detention
Key Terms:
Arbitration
Arbitration
Latest Conference:
2020-02-21
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether the petitioner's allegations of set-up for a false arrest petition for writ of habeas corpus are valid
Question Presented (from Petition)
QUESTION(S) PRESENTED Ud Ure foiaser County Div ch bowl bopritt Epyet Whea (Fale the pltifitwers WMegéetion ¢ set ler fr lA AL petit fer wart “f habeas Lor pul Q¢¢ pe a fur SaAithtiweaf upects And ther trdeed that seo petition Fer ar tk of hihtes Cen pus he damehf 9
Docket Entries
2020-02-24
The motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis is denied, and the petition for a writ of certiorari is dismissed. See Rule 39.8.
2020-01-23
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 2/21/2020.
2020-01-17
Waiver of right of respondent Brad Hansen to respond filed.
2019-12-20
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due February 3, 2020)
Attorneys
Brad Hansen
Stacy Marie Foust — Nebraska Attorney General's Office, Respondent
Stacy Marie Foust — Nebraska Attorney General's Office, Respondent