Whether the appellate court erred in dismissing the petitioner's claims due to lack of timely service of process and whether the district court abused its discretion in denying the petitioner's motion to extend the time for service of process

QUESTIONS PRESENTED 1. Afec wavy defadlints sence of wnmony, we thy requvtd de Campy oat Fede. Cv. & vaca or 1a Co\(1) (AVG) wher vv, timely daswea? And F te Greer 1S Fed. 2 Gu.8 sacdlAN(AVlii), woud detrdets affvmatne deemes be wowed ond | ult adatied whe hay davt Ale on aver hmnlly fr) th 60 digs oher tw requis fy wower & stile of summons is stat to delerdath. 1 Gn Ww fepellate Cou consder td Firs tw on peel a Cofadunts artpanint of @CSOOLE naglect a3 a Form of gpl aust fy tw modhiohn uly Rd. R Gv & lb) (ANA AF vaasnt prestived whe tal Court of pied and prowtn as ‘pln ene" mW ed opel pecceings PARTIES Na ine i Grego Jwhed Clardy G dttonet Gt Muttnomch Gunty Tt ention Centr in Porlnd, “2 at respondists rk Gorn Gulidc, dxty ot Inake Clwer Caretinal Insitute Cy. 2. C1"), Annu Hogs Heal Sed Manat at V2.1, Rae Winks None at S.2GL. John o Tint” Bristls docty at LGL, “Sha” Hae soln, doy at SACL, fob "Dae", dvby at 5.2.C5.,cnd “John” shethn. chief dochy ar 3. CT. DPECTITONS BELOW We decision af te United stakes Court of Appeals fr de Nan Cituit 15 unvepor, | Tr cid w he tthe Gt Jott Os. Mp LEXIS VF951 (4M Cw Jorn) end a (J att Othid w tw hopendrs be ts petit’. babctey . Te Ody of Ta Unit States Distact Coot fx we Det of btgn ‘Ss repoted, Tas Gktd wv he rab at dors U.y. Dist LEALS tou (D. Ot 2018) und a (py 13 attached vv tt napendhx to Dus pethon. 2 AL -@, i 4 TAQLE OF CONTENTS Queshys Prevakd.. ee ce ce eee ee eet RASH eee cove cee ceceee eee eg Gashtohonrcl Powsions And Cout tues Lavolutde a SS Se Rasis fy federal LASdMo ee ee 6 Reams fy Grenkwg We Wihe A. Confit with Decrsuns of okay Caxis Ry Wawer of semild cf summons... ama , R Impure of Me Question frestnitd Ky Wawer of sevucd of summnd. 4+ 40 C. Grfhc Wits Decisions of Onur Quits Fy Reseany Nngumdat... cee ee HO » Imparitnd af Td Questor fesnked fy Prestewny AMIN oe, mae) TAGLE OF _AUTHORITES . Cart: ANSI Tas. Co. wu Admustrahin Asigucibor De Sat, 163 FLD. Molsdyiaas). gg Bach v, Casghtin, JOB Fad 2029 (Ih NAW cee et Regan) VL Unitd Stier, oI WAWDL. 9:17-G-ONMIBIN. eee. Bhnder— Taye Ldougtonts Tac. x, Univesity of Tiiniss Rulon. 409 9.313 (Il ct Grams Gens v. Varnes, 240 Fed Npn Wie (om Cr dO). Fate Clary V. Gick etal, Joi® us. DH LEXTS WoOl4 (Dwe dB)... Ben es) Vv. Ghd. t Gl, aod Us. Np LEXTS 19451 (4m Cu doth tt fon. Gn. UR Tas Co. u New Tmagey of bastly Walls, 331 F.2d 676 (44h (iv d009). 10.12 TH Im (©. ve SatkminGilliland lyP. #38 F.3d 1osO (Bn G7 HOY). | | i Tshasn v. Hamam Recetas Inc, 995 Fad bay (4m Gr N99). cece veececaadd harper \L lang Tm FO 6 Oo Nc (CC 0 9 CVE Matta Frrdhang, Luv. T.1.0 Enlaprses Tac. eal. Os Us. Dok LEXIS WYN. Hovheos we Ue Wg Int. » 404 ed Np 74 bom Gv BON) oe cece eee cee ctO Mander v. Gofoos J008 US. WH LEXTY WSHT (WDALY May 12,2006)... Maphy Qos ve Mithelti Ope 1 3do WS) WY IMILED Ad WMO (99), yaks ve frank Couey Co. Do F.9d 994 (and Ge 903)... stn ve Wolth, W388 0. 1 UWIG cee fant Wt Mey Capon vi My Cor Guy Contiecga JRMILE Tals Qo CACDC 5uIM-CF COs OD W CUAN cce coee cee bocce ee bee ee coe ee bee ee eer ccd Torn Broad cashag sysin Jat. v. nyo Elec. Int. 93 OR 4 (ND. Ge Wer, of'd 44a FAW MUS (in We IdOW), occ ce cee cece eee eed Gniktd SHS. Domninguee Meme, SYX OS. TY (BOM ee torte Whillhums would, 384 £20 5ut (4m Gr a0)... ag Crshhhoul Sovision’s And Shiv: U3. Cnt. Amn BEV a Wo USC NM 2 Des ° a SC LA rr | WR WE MMM ag tt Rd 2 Cw 2 ACA VAY ee Fed. Cw. A UN Ge AT