No. 19-7165
Omar Macias-Macias v. United States
Tags: appellate-jurisdiction appellate-ripeness circuit-split civil-rights constitutional-law criminal-procedure direct-appeal due-process finality jurisdiction justiciability legal-challenge standing supervised-release
Key Terms:
Immigration Privacy JusticiabilityDoctri
Immigration Privacy JusticiabilityDoctri
Latest Conference:
2020-06-04
(distributed 2 times)
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Does the doctrine of prudential ripeness allow the Court of Appeals to dismiss a defendant's timely direct appeal challenging a supervised release condition incorporated in the district court's written judgment, while leaving that condition in place?
Question Presented (from Petition)
QUESTION PRESENTED Does the doctrine of prudential ripeness allow the Court of Appeals to dismiss a defendant’s timely direct appeal challenging a supervised release condition incorporated in the district court’s written judgment, while leaving that condition in place? i
Docket Entries
2020-06-08
Petition DENIED.
2020-05-20
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 6/4/2020.
2020-05-01
Brief of respondent United States of America in opposition filed.
2020-04-21
Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is further extended to and including May 1, 2020.
2020-04-20
Motion to extend the time to file a response from April 29, 2020 to May 1, 2020, submitted to The Clerk.
2020-03-19
Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is further extended to and including April 29, 2020.
2020-03-18
Motion to extend the time to file a response from March 30, 2020 to April 29, 2020, submitted to The Clerk.
2020-02-20
Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is extended to and including March 30, 2020.
2020-02-19
Motion to extend the time to file a response from February 27, 2020 to March 30, 2020, submitted to The Clerk.
2020-01-28
Response Requested. (Due February 27, 2020)
2020-01-23
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 2/21/2020.
2020-01-14
Waiver of right of respondent United States of America to respond filed.
2019-12-31
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due February 3, 2020)
Attorneys
Omar Macias-Macias
James Matthew Wright — Office of the Federal Public Defender, Petitioner
James Matthew Wright — Office of the Federal Public Defender, Petitioner
United States of America
Noel J. Francisco — Solicitor General, Respondent
Noel J. Francisco — Solicitor General, Respondent