Whether appellate counsel was ineffective for failing to raise a plain error of fact material to Leon's third exception, which would have not permitted a good-faith finding

QUESTIONS PRESENTED 1) Reasonable jurists would debate that appellate counsel was ineffective for failing to raise a plain error of fact material to Leon's third . exception, which would have not permitted a good-faith finding, had it béen factored, where, inter alia: The underlying affidavit for search warrant didn't 'merely omit‘ the in fact, a completely different . : address of "1000 Mian Street" (PageID:85, Exhibit D) was averred as the location where “evidence of criminal activity will be found ate." (PageID:85, Exhibit D), thus in fact, rendering the affidavit ; "bare bones' as to the warrant's "709 Elberon Av." (PageID: 82, o , Exhibit E) moo oo | . . .