Whether the federal question of ineffective assistance of trial counsel as the preserved claim of an alibi was vague and/or unexhausted thereby procedurally barring the petitioner from federal review?

QUESTION(S) PRESENTED I. WHETHER THE FEDERAL QUESTION OF INEFFECTIVE ASSISTANCE OF TRIAL COUNSEL AS|! THE: PRESERVED! CLAIM OF AN ALIBI WAS VAGUESAND/OR UNEXHAUSTED THEREBY | .} PROCEDURALLY pans THE PETITIONER FROM FEDERAL REVIEW? : (a) Whether the Petitioner's 6th and 14th amendment rights were violat when the District court failed to determine whether Petitioner's \ “ders claim of ineffectiveness was properly present and not vagu (b) The district court abused its-discretion when it failed to make a finding of whether the PCRA court based its decision on a unreasonable determination of facts regarding K.M., T.M. and T.T. with wespect to Petitioner's county jail stay? ; | : | | . | ~ : . , |