No. 19-7176
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: abuse-of-discretion bias due-process judicial-bias judicial-ethics judicial-misconduct post-conviction-relief recusal trial-procedure
Key Terms:
DueProcess
DueProcess
Latest Conference:
2020-02-21
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Should recusal of a judge be allowed during the post conviction relief phase if the prejudice and bias of the trial judge is apparent on the face of the record from his abuse of discretion in the decisions he made during and before trial?
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTIONS PRESENTED 1. Should recusal of a judge be allowed during the post conviction relief phase if the prejudice and bias of the trial judge is apparent on the face of the record from his abuse of discretion in the decisions he made during and before trial? i
Docket Entries
2020-02-24
Petition DENIED.
2020-02-06
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 2/21/2020.
2020-02-04
Waiver of right of respondent Florida to respond filed.
2019-09-24
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due February 7, 2020)
Attorneys
David P. Moran
David P. Moran — Petitioner
Florida
Wesley Heidt — Respondent