Does denying a pro se individual or public a proper course of justice by a Court violate prior U.S. Supreme Court rulings and The Ninth Amendment to the United States Constitution

QUESTIONS PRESENTED 1) Does denying a pro se individual or public a proper course of justice by a Court violate prior U.S. Supreme Court rulings and The Ninth Amendment to the United States Constitution which states that certain rights such as people’s right to represent themselves in Court shall not be disparaged? 2) Does denying a pro se individual or public a trial by jury by a Court despite the evidence qualifying the matter for jury trial violate The Seventh Amendment to the United States Constitution which states that “In Suits at common law, where the value in controversy shall exceed twenty dollars, the right of trial by jury shall be preserved [...]’? 3) Does denying a pro se individual or public a proper course of justice violate The Fourteenth Amendment to the U.S. Constitution where “nor shall dny state [...] deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws” and affect majority of the population such as public ~ with low-to-middle income, no income an inability to afford an attorney or lack of attorneys willing to work on contingency? 4) Does proper course of justice in a civil case has the same importance to the well-being of the nation as in a criminal case (e.g. civil cases of general public, large corporations or presidents)?