No. 19-7182
Cirilo Mancilla Lopez v. United States
Tags: appeal appellate-review criminal-procedure due-process legal-objection preservation-of-error sentencing-guidelines sentencing-review standard-of-review substantive-unreasonableness
Key Terms:
SocialSecurity Securities Immigration
SocialSecurity Securities Immigration
Latest Conference:
2020-04-17
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether claims of substantive unreasonableness must be preserved by specific objection?
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTIONS PRESENTED FOR REVIEW 1. Whether claims of substantive unreasonableness must be preserved by specific objection? SUBSIDIARY QUESTION: Whether the Court should hold the case pending the resolution of Holguin-Hernandez v. United States, No. 18-7739, 2019 WL 429919, _S.Ct._, U.S. (June 3, 2019)(granting certiorari), and potentially grant certiorari, vacate the judgment below, and remand in light of that case? ii PARTIES Cirilo Mancilla Lopez is the Petitioner, who was the defendant-appellant below. The United States of America is the Respondent, who was the plaintiff-appellee below. ili
Docket Entries
2020-04-20
Petition DENIED.
2020-03-26
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 4/17/2020.
2020-03-06
Memorandum of respondent United States of America filed.
2020-01-30
Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is extended to and including March 6, 2020.
2020-01-29
Motion to extend the time to file a response from February 5, 2020 to March 6, 2020, submitted to The Clerk.
2020-01-02
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due February 5, 2020)
Attorneys
Cirilo Mancilla Lopez
Kevin Joel Page — Office of the Federal Public Defender, Petitioner
Kevin Joel Page — Office of the Federal Public Defender, Petitioner
United States of America
Noel J. Francisco — Solicitor General, Respondent
Noel J. Francisco — Solicitor General, Respondent