Did the United States District Court (USDC) judge abuse his discretion in refusing to recuse himself

QUESTIONS PRESENTED 1) Did the United States District Court (USDC) judge Reed Charles O'Connor abuse his discretion when he refused to recuse himself, in violation of the-plain and concise language in 28 USC §§144 and/or 455, after Petitioner timely filed his recusal motion with supporting sworn and notarized affidavit? 2) Did the USDC judge show bias or prejudice, when the record shows his continued refusal to adjudicate the merits of the undenied facts and irrefuted documented evidence from the Department of Justice (DOJ); the Executive Office for United States Attorneys (EOUSA); the National Personnal Records Center (NPRC), placed before the USDC judge-numerous times, that show that Petitioner's indictment(s) is/are invalid requiring dismissal with prejudice? 3) Was the assistant United States Attorney (AUSA) a duly appointed or authorized attorney for the government, during the relevant time period, when documented evidence shows she was not?; did the USDC judge show bias or prejudice by his continued refusal to adjudicate the merits of this claim-which he has never denied doing? 4) Did the AUSA violate Fed.R.Crim.P. (FRCrP) Rules 6(d)({1) and/or 7(c)(1)?; did the USDC judge show his bias or prejudice for his continued refusal to adjudicate the merits ofithis claim-which he has never denied doing? . i :