No. 19-7192

Keith Edward Walker v. Ronda Pash, Warden

Lower Court: Eighth Circuit
Docketed: 2020-01-07
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
IFP
Tags: 28-usc-2254 appellate-review civil-procedure civil-rights clearly-established-law due-process equal-protection federal-jurisdiction federal-review finality-of-judgment habeas-corpus standing state-court-decision statute-of-limitations
Key Terms:
AdministrativeLaw
Latest Conference: 2020-03-06
Question Presented (AI Summary)

Does the reamme of 28 U.S.C. 2244(d) and (p) create ambiguity in 28 U.S.C. 2244(d)(1) regarding the one-year period of litigation

Question Presented (from Petition)

QUESTION(S) PRESENTED _ _(@D) does THe Reaamwe oF a6 v.s.c. 3 aad (p 0 VA) CREATE AMBIGDTY ze a agvsc. 8 aad (A) O@) eeaa tv PaxT, p owe Year PerRiok of luwGATION . sual acely “to aw arelication Lor A wail ok Waseas Compus By A Person Iv __Small_ @uw Leom,.. Tue SATE ow waren THe SuaewrenT Become Erma) By THE ___ conclusion of aimect REVIEW... eee eee nett es en THe A ‘ We Mie ow wien Tue Guremem Become Ewal ey THe Conclusion ob iREgD ___ REVIEW . . lus BEED AMBIGLOUS ly ACTING WwW THE IOSTANT CASE . WE AMBIGUITY ATToRvey Geveral oli vEA A. Uayers Presented 1 THE Response To fusied __ Govet Quaee ontmie Smurals snow CAUSE ORMER, 0 ___ABNI TIONAL EVIBERCE CF AMBIGULLTY WOUIA BE WILAEA WO ctuw Suace Sanmls __Letal conthers BRoveHT OUT By WS 2017 DAVIS VWACBEE CASE ANDTHE ___ Swulae walker y. TASH CASE RECIRED ID BEI THE IWSTANT CASEIN WCBEE ___ Suge Sevtels Reston COME WITA EXISTING laws AS He Actwowlences, Sse: Eval SoaemensT of THE APPE Wxte court Becomes Cowal aT THE WADAKe ___ aie” Waere “Telliee Time BEEW To RU AGAIN "See @uestion Go ___{w THe: werent case, Goace Sm ITH CREATE A Cecal coptieT exposieG THe _Feseitng am@icurty w aad (b) (wen ue ppostTs myers ___seeomeny tuen Puslisues A SunewenT ww conten ob ensue laws we Lecally PUBLISHEA AUTHORITIES | ORAERING at we Suscareny was Ewa] wHew . _ THe wo, APpellATE CovRT EWTEFER ae OPINION WW walker!s MirecT Review _ Susce Suntta's AROPTATION ot Tac STATE'S ASSERTION, . tue SusomedT aveawsT _. ; TetTioverR, Become Ewale OW POVEMBER. Llp, BOLE ‘ LOVEMBER Ile, aoile toeloaes . The Grace Tertok to File Tue optional ReueaRIWG FEQuvesT Ter Tac Yovemace _ -_|,22\0 oF WION BEEIO To wenl leny, TRE AMBIGUITY AS WayeRS Go ON IO AMA i meee (ne DATE OW Wien THe WAlssovel Court of apreale Ab Eiemes ts covudins Coovember (ote) a" WoRIcH peleerence we w Common SET OT Ib THE A Uaie wore AEE nets The Vovemeee t, roile Convictions ava Eivalizes Tate : . U Ap Pea on Keremeee ai, DO\e Tuereey Teas Cememe Svueisriciion env THT Mie, _ See vnited Sintes V. Ruwvers $A EF. ah cle ___ ABOVE 16 Evibence of wayers RECePTVERESS As she wakes aw comlosine AceuMmcrl __{welvanwe Bota Tre Mae We OPMmIoP Was EMIERER AUA THE Wriawamie ARIE wien At Eiems Tae Copvictions awh FeansCeers Guarsar cron WED THE TONGS UME Wo WAILERS Case ShovIn BEG 10 RUN Again aR orawe Hm egual PRoiectiow. _ tb) BaVera THe CooRT wries f Swerly per, Gorisarction Pollows THe Wasi Sek OSTRER oe Tan aT S44, The ettecd of THE WranandTe ISTo BRIG ___ THE Peoteepines WA Case on appeal W our Court Toa close AWATO __ Femove U1 From The SumenictTion ot THs covet, RETIROIWE Oto The _ Forom wrevce «1. come ee ee ee _. Svace Surrtuls acta ava sort Susewenis are WeRPe|eTaTions oC aauy AVG &) welunes wleesl Preesiaents waren © uas THe Tolle Tues BEeGINwING AT The Kate Tue Apeeals cound eviews TS orion avalor @ _ MAS THE Toth G Tne BEGINVING To HOV AGAW AT THE UAADAATE Adve. ORE Of THE SPuents A Peacaeolent PeesiAepe ALA WALST BE coRRECTEA, ib STe|ew vy. Seweizle sav Ret Appx I72 The court cone! os6en A wnro. Peri Toner’ S SiaTeE PosT— conwetion Reliek Tre CEENIWGS Reman TEMAIDe _ _. Rex Toeroses of at USe 8 maUuy UL) ISSUANCE of THe WiALaATE _ ee _ Fotlowwe abtiesmaoce of the Aewil ok Reltek, Wo The STANT case The _ EreeTa caret’ Aenied The aprea| THEREBY ABOPTING Weyer S_ as WwIEReRe ATIon THET THe SunemesT Become Pinal Be Core Tue tsgvance ; OFTHE WAAwARTE WHIEH Ih EFFECT Gwe RISE lo AV AMBIGUOUS aauy MM). The AMBIGOITY Allowen Iv THE ResninG of a¢ LSC aady prises WHEN Tue lan CaS & Aves Lot wake THE AistipcTiow AS To WHEN THE Ul -_-Covelosion ok OimecT Review 15 Ewwal tHe nave Tue mussoves apeesls Covet eviereh THE oPiwiod of Al THE UAANOKTE KATE WHEN ame Goverment ___tisathiemes. ee a ee __GE)_1s THe stave ok Mussovml WENT OwAlly UNseonSTRLWE 2S use Saauy (ey) GY ® Zo Nery PeckecTcA LEUTED SIRES ConsTiTeTtonal Rigtis: SecURER LvAer | . _ HE ihre avreamrenst © avafor 1s. ALSTRICT Gunee oOmiriG A. Suurve allowwe . ADA ABOPTING Tue STATE of Yon SHo

Docket Entries

2020-03-09
Petition DENIED.
2020-02-20
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 3/6/2020.
2019-12-20
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due February 6, 2020)

Attorneys

Keith Edward Walker
Keith Edward Walker — Petitioner
Keith Edward Walker — Petitioner