Whether the Colorado statute on complicity in sex trafficking violates the First Amendment and due process rights of the defendant by criminalizing speech that does not directly promote illegal activity

QUESTION(S) PRESENTED . I.Rosec onthe, complicity Statue (CRS, 2018 S18-1-008, 'S takay Phdes for 0 backpage.com ad ,poying Sor the. ad} instructing a person on wot %p | write on Are. od renting a. hcl foam Coaching 0. person on hou» te ak ) Voth Potential customers eraigh ‘oF an affirmnakive ack(Ss so trata daherdant fs Comlattln CRS SAHOO) and does omy af Hock Prove nto to Commit $1874 rane of te ads Promate sex. (nd cher facts of my cases?) ¢ , 2, When leg’lathon oreoed GRAS, S1-T-Holo Aig. untet wt to punish these Whe protit of? prostitution imps aud, panda). Oind, idee hn errno to Part (a1) of He Stabe, clic leglslatan only. mean pimps, (and pancbrere) who use, force ea ZCRSSR-7A Go does Indo. prestituke cesponsitle.. go wallet frat Mdon . a titer Con cry be compel helpig Q joan? : Uke tk a duo. press vidotan 6 gaseciion fwd el deferce-connel erdays buoe ‘Mol Haak Butyl oe. oousing. defendant ob Complicity in reqacds 0.0 tain Chacgeyat Hil? Questo’) Presented | | EERCR Ruleile on ppg of Covetonil and Stodory Inisins Tasha Te t corettubionl te adend tw definthion of a. drape, by adding the. ~toupitdeydokske, tf a charge Cor statute) rmakes io etartion oF canpicters 2 |