Whether the lower state court erred in sanctioning the petitioner's departure from the accepted judicial proceedings regarding the decision governing Grayson County's denial of access to a law library while the petitioner was proceeding pro se

QUESTION(S) PRESENTED HE 41. Peririonec: Wun boly Sequests this honorable Couct Sor an exercise of XS Supecvisory Power over the lower State Couct’s Sanctioning of a depasruse Soom whe AUepted anak wsuol Course of Sodicial proceedings rN teaosds to the decision sovecning Grayson Coury Tors denial of access to a law libcary while Petitioner was pooveeding ero Se. . THE 2. Perrrioner mow asks’ thor this \nonocable cousx exercise +s ‘ Sucervisory Power over due lowes Stake court's Sanctioning of Peritionec’s personal banks account at Chase Bank being Scozen or pu on Yolk wrtrouk a wascark , Subpeona oF Coucr order being issned 0S pack of o Civ Assek Forfertuce Proceeding ord also wrhout the Bank Account in Question ever being listed on any documen® to be seized ov Frozen. FE 3. Perirromner moves rok this honorable cour exercise W'S Supervisory powes over the lower Stake Couck’s Sanctioning of i¥s denial of Pekirioner’s Multiple Pro Se motions for discovery While Simuttaneousy beang denied access to @ law library While he was Proceeding Reo Se. i