Whether the lower courts properly addressed the petitioner's common law claims, viewed the claims in the light most favorable to the petitioner, and fully appreciated the nature of the alleged malfeasant actions against the petitioner's constitutional rights

No question identified. : . Issues Raised For Review 1. Did either the District Court and the Court of Appeals directly address in good faith the common law claims that were presented by Petitioner in the manner as they were originally presented to the court by Petitioner? 2. In the issuances of the orders pertaining to the litigation of the original case, did either the district or appellate court jurists view Petitioner's claims in the light most favorable to him? 3. Did the decisions of either the district or appellate court reflect a full apprehension or appreciation of the nature of the malfeasant actions of Respondent’s state actor employees and their targeted actions against the rights of Petitioner? 4. Was Petitioner's original, standard “green card service” upon the Respondents, which was sent _ and delivered through the United States Postal Service, sufficient to procedurally initiate the case? 5. Was Petitioner prejudiced by the dilatory actions of the District Court when it ordered Petitioner to “re-start” the original action and “re-serve” the original complaint on Respondent “COUNTY OF CALHOUN’ without the other originally named Respondents? 6. Was Petitioner prejudiced by the peremptory dismissal of Respondents “STATE OF MICHIGAN’ and “MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS’? 7. Did the District Court procedurally deny Petitioner fundamental due process when it procedurally disposed of the instant action without providing the opportunity for Petitioner to go to trial? 8. Is the qualifying phrase “All Rights Reserved’ a legal nullity, and without legal significance within a tegal document? 9. Does the “pattern and practice” of state incarceration for “failure to pay” actually constitute the establishment and maintenance of a system of peonage? 10. Does a court clerk have the power to decide the justiciable insufficiency of a pro se complaint and deny its filing based on strictly formalistic grounds? 11. Is the currently existing form of government of the United States actually an unconstitutional de facto corporate fascist police state administered by martial rule? ; i .