Should petitioners notice of appeal have been construed as a request for a certificate of appealability on grounds 1-12 and 14-15, and was failure to construe the notice of appeal violative of petitioner's due process and equal protection of law pursuant to the US const. amend 14?

QUESTION(S) PRESENTED . _ SHOULD PETITIONERS NOTICE OF APPEAL HAVE BEEN. CONSTRUED AS A REQUEST FOR A _ CERTIFICATE OF APPEALABILITY ON GROUNDS 1-12 AND 14-15, AND WAS FAILURE TO CONSTRUE THE NOTICE OF APPEAL VIOLATIVE OF PETITIONER’S DUE PROCESS AND EQUAL PROTECTION OF LAW PURSUANT TO THE US. a CONST. AMEND 147! WHETHER THE UNITED STATES. ELEVENTH CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEAL APPLIED STRICKLANDS PREJUDICE PRONG UNREASONABLE TO PETITIONER’S CLAIM OF _ INEFFECTIVE ASSISTANCE OF COUNSEL FOR _. FAILURE TO PRESERVE BATSON ISSUE FOR APPEAL .